Drawing and labelling: New ways of answering questions on the Assessment Resource Banks

Authors
Downloads
Citation
Fisher, J. (2021). Drawing and labelling: New ways of answering questions on the Assessment Resource Banks. Set: Research Information for Teachers, 2, 40–42. https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0203

Drawing and labelling

New ways of answering questions on the Assessment Resource Banks

JONATHAN FISHER

Introduction

The Assessment Resource Banks (ARBs) offer an innovative space to explore how responsive assessment for learning can work off- and online with Aotearoa New Zealand teaching and learning situations. Since 2003, ARBs have been designed to support formative assessment in the classroom. In 2014, work began to redevelop a number of existing pencil-and-paper resources to interactive tasks that could be completed by students online (Joyce & Fisher, 2014). Now, in 2021, over half the 2,850 resources can be completed online, as well as downloaded as pencil-and-paper tasks. Approximately one-third of the online-interactive tasks can be completely auto-marked by the website.

Many online-interactive assessment tasks use multiple choice or typing in short or long answers. ARB resource developers were also keen to find other ways for students to respond, with the aim of making the online experience more accessible, interactive, and engaging for students. Drag-and-drop and hotspot ways of responding begin to meet this challenge. However, as we redeveloped a number of pencil-and-paper resources to online, we wanted to provide less-constrained ways for students to express their thinking. While students responding online might be able to write to “explain” a thing, they couldn’t “show their working” or “draw a …” without a new way to respond. As a result, we started exploring ways that students could “show” or “draw” using a drawing tool panel.

Figure 1. The basic tool panel of an online drawing resource

Drawing and labelling online

The drawing/labelling question type provides a way for students to express their thinking or learning when answering certain online assessment tasks. It is important to emphasise that drawing online is different from drawing on paper. It is a particular online skill that may well need to be taught beforehand to ensure it isn’t a barrier to the assessment focus of the task. Figure 1 shows the tool panel that students need to learn to use.

Students can select a pencil, an eraser, a line, a shape, a text box (for labelling) or a polygon. They move shapes around, choose colours for line or fill, undo or redo, and zoom in or out, or clear the panel. They can also make the line dashed, or an arrow, or adjust the line thickness.

When a student completes an online drawing assessment, their results will illustrate what they know about the learning area and their level of proficiency with an online drawing tool to construct a basic drawing or a labelled diagram. Such resources can clearly support the development of students’ digital fluency. Learning to draw online is a key digital skill and at some stage may help students develop interest for future digital graphic creation.

The medium of drawing, and what drawing experiences students are familiar with, will need to be taken into consideration when reviewing student responses. For example, drawing with a mouse can be more difficult than drawing on an iPad with a finger, which can, in turn, be more difficult than drawing on paper with a pencil. You will also need to consider the time frame given for students to complete the task. For example, drawing a line to show symmetry may require a few seconds, labelling a diagram: several minutes, drawing an intricate detailed diagram might take half an hour, or a detailed freehand diagram might require a stylus and might not be a reasonable expectation with a computer mouse.

Like all online-interactive tasks, drawing and labelling tasks can be completed online across a range of devices: iPads, Macs, PC laptops, and Android devices. This new question type cannot be auto-marked by the website, but results can be viewed in the teacher-account results area. Resources with drawing/labelling questions can also be downloaded and completed with pencil and paper.

Some examples of items that use the drawing tool

Altogether, over 100 resources have been redeveloped to enable students to answer by drawing or labelling online, as well as by pencil and paper.

Drawing/labelling science resources

Drawing and labelling questions can be especially useful in science for drawing and labelling diagrams. Some examples of science resources are:

The water cycle1 and Solar eclipse2 (complete or mark on a diagram)

What’s in the garden, L0243, and W0254 (draw and label to add to a sketch)

Dissolving sugar5, The disappearing puddle6, and Inside the Earth7 (draw and label a diagram from the beginning)

Drawing/labelling mathematics resources

There are many examples of resources that use the drawing/labelling question type that ask students to draw a range of responses; from drawing a line (Mirrors and symmetry8, Draw a line9), to drawing a simple shape (Reflecting shapes10, Fitting together11) or a number of shapes (Tessellating patterns12). Other tasks may require more drawing skill, drawing complex shapes or reflections (Area of shapes13, Reflecting figures14, Reflecting shapes III15). Some tasks require a student to continue a repeating pattern (Transforming patterns III16, Transforming patterns IV17).

Drawing/labelling English resources

Drawing/labelling questions can also be used in listening comprehension resources. For example, the resources, The robot18 (see Figure 2) and Sea creature19, ask students to listen to a description of strange creatures and draw them on the web page. Further resources, Finding your way20 and follow21 ask students to listen and then draw pathways on maps using the online drawing tool.

Assessment online including its future potential

Online assessment has some clear benefits. However, it is a different experience from using pencil and paper and comes with different learning affordances. Some of the key benefits of online assessment (on ARBs) are:

interactivity between the device and the learner enabled by web technologies

delivery of assessments through a web platform

functionality for teachers to view student responses real-time

location to store evidence of student learning

assessment availability can be scaled up by scaling up the ARB web server

piloting and trialling can be run online and results can be analysed in real-time

publication costs are essentially the website and bandwidth

maintenance and updating is centralised on the website and doesn’t require print reruns.

While recognising the pros of online web technology, it is also important to acknowledge cons, such as it can be hard to express learning or thinking on a device, and equity issues related to: access to devices; access to internet; and access to enriching learning experiences with connected digital devices. The implications of whether online assessment might benefit some learners over others need to be considered. Still, the formative purposes of ARB resources mean that ARBs intend to focus on supporting individual student’s learning ideas.

While an online device is a tool with great potential, a pencil and a piece of paper are still powerful technologies to freely express a wide range of thoughts about knowledge and learning. They are accessible, portable, and don’t require connection to greater technological infrastructures. ARBs have long catered for such pencil-and-paper assessment experiences. Ultimately, teachers choose the type of assessment resource and the medium that best suits the needs of their learners.

There is also nothing stopping students working in a hybrid fashion with off- and online. For example, students could be answering an online assessment while making notes or drawing with a pad and pencil, or students could work with their peers and then swap over. The resources What shape am I?22 and Describing dogs23 ask students to work with a peer.

Smartphones

Some of work on the horizon for ARBs involves running assessment tasks on smartphones. Currently, ARBs work across a wide range of devices and operating systems, and we are looking at enabling assessment resources (as well as wider NZCER assessments) to work on Android and iPhone smartphones. We are also redeveloping a number of listening comprehension tasks to run online with audio recording of the main text.

Text-to-speech and speech-to-text

Also on the horizon is better text-to-speech audio for assessment resources. Currently, the texts for many resources can also be heard through an automated audio library. However, this technology relies upon an open-source development, and, unsurprisingly, the pronunciation of words, particularly the New Zealand accent and Māori kupu, can be problematic. The ARB team is also looking at browser-based audio recording alongside speech-to-text to explore future oral-language assessment for speaking. Using this technology, students could record their speaking (conversation, discussion, explanation, dissertation, etc.) and teachers could both hear the recording and view a transcript. For example, the resource, The monarch: Chrysalis to butterfly24, could use this feature by students saying their observations out loud as they watch the video of the life stages of a monarch butterfly.

ARBs are one useful tool in your assessment kete

ARBs are a freely available online repository of formative assessment tasks that link to The New Zealand Curriculum (Ministry of Education, 2007). They have the potential to support flexible learning situations, wherever the learning takes place. The best way to explore some of the recent innovations might be to go to the website, use a keyword like “draw”, and have a look at this drawing and labelling question type in action.

As a part of our work, ARB resource developers seek out new ideas and technologies for doing formative assessment online. While creating these resources, we look to cater for various enablers and barriers for online assessment for learning. There are so many interactive and engaging ways to elicit student thinking, not the least talking to them. Drawing and labelling online might be really helpful, but we recognise that it is just one way to explore student thinking. Task selection should be based upon the learning needs of the learner, not the novelty of a web technology.

Notes

1.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/6605

3.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/resources/living-dairy-farm

4.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/resources/what-lives-our-waterways

5.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/6723

6.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/6722

2.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/resources/solar-eclipse

7.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/resources/inside-earth

8.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/4848

9.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/4980

10.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/4897

11.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/4830

12.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/4855

13.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/4646

14.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/4901

15.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/4819

16.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/4856

17.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/4885

18.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/3613

19.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/3614

21.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/node/3676

22.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/resources/what-shape-am-i

23.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/resources/describing-dogs

24.https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/resources/monarch-chrysalis-butterfly

References

Joyce, C., Fisher, J. (2014). Assessment for learning, online tasks, and the new Assessment Resource Banks.Set: Research Information for Teachers, (2), 51–53. https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0314

Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Learning Media.

Jonathan Fisher is a senior resource developer/researcher at the New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

Email: jonathan.fisher@nzcer.org.nz