This project, now completed, investigated the actual and potential role of games (including digital and non-digital, gameplay, game design, and gamification) to support ‘transformative learning opportunities’ for diverse learners in New Zealand schools.

The project foregrounded the experiences of New Zealand teachers and learners as game players, game selectors, or game makers. It aimed to understand:

  • how users and players think about games in relation to learning
  • what personal and pedagogical choices they make when games are used in learning environments
  • what happens in the learning environment when games are part of the picture.

This data was woven together with theory from the growing international literature on games for learning to provide a critical perspective on possible directions for games to support New Zealand learners to develop their potential.

Project team

Rachel Bolstad, Sue McDowall, Elliot Lawes

Cover image
Image
Games for Learning header.png
Contact person(s)

This evaluation aims to understand how well the Teach First NZ programme pilot delivered in partnership with the University of Auckland has been implemented and to what extent it has achieved its objectives. It is a four-year independent evaluation commissioned by the Ministry of Education (2013-2016).

Teach First NZ is a partnership with the University of Auckland to attract university graduates and professionals to secondary schools serving lower-decile communities. People with specialist undergraduate degrees in high-priority subject areas are selected to enter into an intensive eight-week residential training programme and are then placed in jobs in lower-decile secondary schools for two years in Auckland and Northland with on-going support, mentoring and development before graduating as qualified teachers.

The project's fourth and final report has been published.

Project leader: Jenny Whatman

Project contact: Jo Macdonald

This project undertook three case studies where students - and their teachers - had  access to different kinds of community and professional experts as part of their school-based learning. It investigated how these collaborations or partnerships arose and how they worked to transform "business as usual" curriculum, teaching, and learning.  We were particularly interested in understanding the professional learning and growth opportunities for the adults involved - the teachers, and the other professionals - that arose from these collaborations.

The schools we case studied were:

We will soon be publishing a summary of key themes identified across the case studies and relating to wider themes in other research on school-community collaboration.

Who are "community and professional experts"?

In this project we defined them as people who are not necessarily educators or teachers, but who have knowledge and expertise in their own professional areas, or because of their role in the community, and are working with schools in ways that support learners to connect with that knowledge and expertise. This broad category could include professionals from a wide range of fields (scientists, artists, engineers, designers, writers), people in businesses, people from local iwi, people working in local government, community leaders, parents and whanau with specialist expertise, and many others. 

What is the link to "future-oriented learning?"

This project builds from  the six principles for a future-oriented learning  system hypothesised in a 2012 report for the Ministry of Education. It is especially pertinent to principle 6 which calls for "new kinds of partnerships and relationships between schools and the wider community". This principle asserts that for a variety of reasons, schools on their own can no longer be expected to provide all of the knowledge, expertise, and resources that students need for 21st century learning. Learners need better opportunities to access knowledge, expertise, and learning contexts within the wider community. They also need opportunities to exercise the development of their capabilities in authentic contexts (for example, generating and applying knowledge in ways that contribute value to others' lives, as well as contributing to their own learning and development).

This research project assumes that the professional and community expertise has the potential to complement school-based educational expertise and that schools can and should play a key role in orchestrating these kinds of learning opportunities for students.  It is therefore important to understand what enhances or diminishes schools' capabilities to connect and collaborate with external expertise. It is also important to consider how equitable learning opportunities can be achieved across different schools and communities.

Why focus on the impacts of these collaborations for the adults involved?

The core argument for these kinds of school-community relationships is their benefit for students' learning. However, a primary focus for this research was to understand the impacts and experiences of adults who work together in these collaborations - the teaching professionals, and the community and professional experts. The reason for this focus is that adults (as teachers, school leaders, policy decision-makers, parents or voters) shape the educational system. For system-wide shifts to occur, it is important to know how and why adults think it is beneficial for school learners to have access to community and professional expertise as part of their school learning, and how they think this can happen effectively. By examining "success cases", we were specifically looking for sites where there is evidence that these collaborations have influenced adults' thinking about learning, teaching, curriculum, schooling, young people, and their own professional roles. By looking at cases across a range of contexts, we sought to understand how the principle of integrating teachers' expertise with community/professional expertise to support learning can be enacted in different ways to support diverse learners, schools, and communities.

Some schools are engaging with people and groups from the wider community to support innovative learning for students. If this work is to be scaled up, it needs systemic support and to be underpinned by research. Educational professionals and partners from the wider community need support to work in the spaces between their different areas of expertise and to talk and listen to each other – across professional and/or cultural boundaries. (NZ Curriculum Update #26

Cover image
Image
Schools collaborating with experts header.jpg
Contact person(s)

"For days and days, you make out only the fragments of what to do. And then one day you’ve got the thing whole. Conscious learning becomes unconscious knowledge, and you cannot say precisely how". (Atul Gawande in Complications, 2002, p. 21)

Knowing Practice was a study of practice-based learning (apprenticeship or vocational immersion). It involved 41 GP registrars, carpentry apprentices, and engineering technician cadets, and their workplace-based mentors, advisors, and teachers. 

Participants told us about their most significant learning experiences while working in their field. Stories almost always revealed the “big picture” of practice, with all its aspects interconnected. There was a memorable, “no going back” quality. The challenges were personal as well as professional. Sometimes they involved painful realisations. 

To better understand these experiences, we generated the idea of vocational thresholds: transformational learning experiences that develop not just knowledge and ability to do things but a way to be as a practitioner.

For example, GPs learn to reposition their clinical knowledge in a relationship-centred, community setting. Carpenters learn to integrate values and judgement with their technical skill. Engineer technicians learn to contend with the social impact of their work. Competence is not simply an individual, technical matter. It is an identity demand connected to a community. 

There are probably sets of vocational thresholds for practice in any field. Workplace mentors and teachers play an important part in supporting learner-practitioners to recognise and cross these thresholds. There are implications for the kinds of experiences learner-practitioners are exposed to, and when, as well as the deliberate practice opportunities provided.

 


We thank our key stakeholder groups for their support:

  1. the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners (RNZCGP)
  2. the Building and Construction Industry Training Organisation (BCITO)
  3. the Institute of Professional Engineers of New Zealand (IPENZ).

Knowing Practice was funded by NZCER through its purchase agreement with the Ministry of Education, and by Ako Aotearoa: the Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence.

An overview of PB4L and NZCER's evaluation

What is PB4L?

Positive Behaviour for Learning (PB4L) provides initiatives and support to help schools, teachers, and students across New Zealand.

Engaged children with positive behaviours are more likely to succeed in school. PB4L aims to provide strategies to create a climate where positive behaviour and learning flourish.

PB4L was co-developed with key education sector organisations and is being led by the Ministry of Education. 

To learn more about the PB4L initiatives, visit MoE’s website:  http://pb4l.tki.org.nz/

Read a letter from key education sector groups endorsing the evaluation.

The NZCER evaluation will explore the short-term outcomes of five PB4L initiatives.

We will assess how well these initiatives are supporting schools, services, and teachers to provide learning environments or individual support that fosters student engagement and wellbeing.

Our findings will help build knowledge about the outcomes of the initiatives and models of good practice. 

We encourage schools, facilitators and other stakeholders to take part in the different evaluation activities. By working together we can build a stronger education system. 

Read our evaluation principles.

 

PB4L initiatives NZCER is evaluating

School-Wide: A framework that involves school leaders, teachers, students and support staff in building consistent approaches to behaviour to enable academic and social success for all students.

Incredible Years – Teacher Programme: Provides teachers with tools to turn disruptive behaviour around and create a more positive learning environment for children aged 3-8 years.

Intensive Wraparound Service: Provides students who have significant complex social or behavioural needs or complex needs due to intellectual impairments the personalised support they need to achieve in learning.

Friends: Supports students’ social and emotional skills and provides them coping strategies to enable them to work through their problems and improve their capacity to learn.

Check & Connect: A mentoring programme that promotes and facilitates engagement among students at risk of disengaging from learning through persistent relationship focused on building student resilience, problem solving and goal setting capabilities. 

Contact person(s)

This kaupapa Māori study aims to support whānau reo Māori language development in their transitions to and between kōhanga reo, kura kaupapa primary, wharekura, secondary and tertiary education. We are especially interested in how Māori learners and whānau are supported during these times of change. 

This research builds on the work Te Wāhanga undertook in 2011/12, Kia Puāwaitia Ngā Tūmanako, which looked at the critical issues for whānau in education. Whānau in that study identified Ngā Moemoeā (whānau aspirations), Rangatiratanga (whānau authority/autonomy), and Te Reo Rangatira (learning and maintenance of reo Māori) as critical issues for whānau in education. These interrelated kaupapa guided our approach to this study which is grounded in whanaungatanga. In the course of this study we spoke with whānau at kōhanga reo, kura kaupapa Māori, wharekura, Pākehā primary and secondary schools, and tertiary education organisations.

Contact person(s)

NZCER was one of several organisations involved in the development of the Progress and Consistency Tool (PaCT)  for the Ministry of Education.  You can find out more on the PaCT website.

PaCT is intended to help teachers make consistent judgments against the National Standards in reading, writing and maths. NZCER was responsible for facilitating the psychometric work associated with the tool development and we collaborated with a number of organisations on this work.

 

The PaCT tool has three components:
• an assessment rubric for each of the learning areas relevant to the National Standards (reading, writing and mathematics)
• a database to record student details and assessment records
• a reporting engine to present information that allows teachers and schools to link rubric scores, and test results for individual students and cohorts of students to national standards levels and monitor progress over time.

NZCER is currently carrying out work for the Ministry of Education looking at how reporting for the PaCT can be enhanced to carry more descriptive information about achievement and progress.

Contact person(s)

NZCER provided evaluation support to Sport New Zealand to assist in the framing and evaluation of a new Sport in Education initiative.  Sport in Education is a five year project which aims to deliver improved academic, social, PE and sporting outcomes in secondary schools. For more information about Sport in Education, go to their web page.

The evaluation support provided by NZCER included:

  • writing literature reviews to inform the project
  • assisting in the development of a programme logic and evaluation plan
  • assisting schools to develop inquiries about Sport in Education initiatives they are trialling.
  • assistance with the identification of relevant survey and assessment tools
  • working with school staff to document examples of successful practice relating to sport in education.

Resources for teacher use:

Contact person(s)

NZCER was contracted by the Ministry of Education to develop an online tool for schools to support them to explore the extent to which school practices are inclusive of all students. The Inclusive Practices Tools (IPT) will support primary and secondary school leaders to collect data from their school community for the purposes of self-review.

Format and content of Inclusive Practices Tools (IPT)

The Inclusive Practices Tools were developed in the form of four online surveys/tools that explore similar concepts, but are aimed at different members of the school community:

  1. Inclusive Practices Staff Survey
  2. Inclusive Practices Community Survey for parents, whānau and caregivers
  3. Inclusive Practices Student Survey
  4. Inclusive Practices School Review Profile (SRP)

These tools explore views on school practices that relate to the concepts of PresenceParticipation, and Learning

The IPT builds on the set of indicator questions recently developed by the Education Review Office (ERO, 2010). These questions are used by ERO to review how well schools include students with high special education needs.

The self-review process

The IPT and related support materials are located on the Wellbeing@School website.[2] This enables the IPT to make use of the survey platform and self-review process on this site. 

This step-by-step self-review process encourages schools to engage in ongoing self-improvement and enlist the support of the wider school community to plan, action, and review changes.

Support and data storage

Now that the development project is complete, schools can register to use the Inclusive Practices Tools on the Wellbeing@School website (www.wellbeingatschool.org.nz). The  Inclusive Practices Tools will provide a basic range of resources and services to all schools at no cost (these include access to: the self-review process, the tools, online data warehousing and basic reports of school data, and guidelines and support materials.)

NZCER will act as steward for school data which will be stored in an online database. Confidential reports of their data will be available to schools. Under the terms of a data protocol, reporting options will be designed so that agencies such as the Ministry of Education can be provided with reports of grouped data that do not identify schools or individuals.

Timeline

This project started with the formation of a reference group who supported the development of the overall framework and draft tools. Following this, a prototype (trial) resource was be located online for the sector to use and offer feedback. A finalised version of the tools and support materials has been available online since the end of 2013.

The development timeline was:

  • Phase 1: Development of the tool framework and draft tools (Jul-Oct 2012)
  • Phase 2: Piloting of tools and online platform (Dec 2012-Feb 2013)
  • Phase 3: Draft prototype tools located online for sector use and feedback (prior to Term 2: May - early July 2013)
  • Phase 4: Review of prototype and final adjustments to tools and support (Jul 2013)
                       Tools and support materials available for school use (Term 3: 5 Aug 2013)
  • Phase 5: Minor adjustments completed as required (Sep-Dec 2013)
Contact person(s)

This project is one of a series of three projects in the Science in the curriculum programme of work. NZCER has been contracted to the Ministry of Education to undertake the projects and is collaborating with CWA and The University of Waikato.

In this project we aim to identify the range and variety of ways in which teachers and students interact with people and groups from the science community to support students’ learning and engagement with science. Te Wāhanga is involved in exploring the types of connections/partnerships that exist between Māori students in English Medium and the science community.

We are exploring the following questions:

  • What kinds of connections/partnerships exist between schools and the science community?
  • What are these partnerships/engagements aiming to do?
  • Who are they targeted at and who is involved?
  • How are they resourced?
  • What are the benefits to schools? What are the benefits to the science community partners?
  • What are the issues and challenges for these connections/partnerships?
Contact person(s)